Our (Indo-European) languages tend to be highly noun-oriented with the self or ego being at the center of life. By contrast, quantum theory demands a more process-oriented approach, a verb-based language perhaps that emphasizes FLOW,movement and constant transformation.

Western science had reached the end of linear thought and finally understands the universe is a living, conscious, interconnected organism.Most signficantly,the essence of our linear ego as a separate entity is now in question.

The indigenous people always have reverently tied to the land,they have been the natural world’s caretakers for thousands of years. They are of the world, living not just sustainably but in intimate relationship with their sacred piece of Planet Earth.

And now 500 years after Western conquistadors subdued and divided the planet, devastating indigenous people on every continent and, while they were at it, pushing the natural world to the brink of eco-collapse, we are turning — some of us — to the wisdom of connectedness that has been ours for the asking all along.

This isn’t easy or simple. Our disconnect from one another, from ourselves and from the natural world is embedded in the Western languages, which break the world into millions of discrete, manipulable pieces, called nouns. Westerners control reality through language, but they don’t evoke it. Indigenous languages are verb-based, intrinsically linking speaker and object in a FLOW of motion that cannot be linguistically sliced and diced.

Quantum and Relativity theories may be very different, but they agree denying the existence of single static particles, they agree in describing the world as an undivided whole in constant flux (albeit in completely different ways) in which all parts of the universe are constantly interacting; and that includes the illusion of an observer, the “I”. The universe is characterized by a “FLOW” that integrates everything: individual forms are the equivalent of a still photograph of an object in motion. It turns out that we perceive the “FLOW” of reality through those static images, but those still images are only a simplification of motion. By analogy, what goes on in our mind is a FLOW of consciousness, and not coming from a separate thinker, but are mere instances of the FLOW of thought. Thought is a kind of movement, and concepts are invented objects. ”

To put it crudely, one could say that objects do not really exist, only flow exist. An object is just “slow” flow; that is, it refers to a process that is progressing so slowly so as to appear static. For example, the paper on which this text is printed appears to have a stable existence, but we know that it is, at all times including this very moment, changing and evolving towards dust. Hence paper would more accurately be called papering–to emphasize that it is always and inevitably a dynamic process undergoing perpetual change.

One Response

  1. Another good one, Sid. Thanks for sharing your wisdom.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s